Article: Succession Without Status: Rethinking Testamentary Freedom and Family Provision
Bridget J. Crawford (Pace University – School of Law) recently published, Succession Without Status: Rethinking Testamentary Freedom and Family Provision, 2026. Provided below is an Abstract:
American succession law stands out for its uncompromising embrace of testamentary freedom. With only narrow protections for surviving spouses and unintentionally omitted heirs, U.S. law permits near-total disinheritance. This statusbased model privileges marriage and leaves children, stepchildren, unpaid caregivers, long-term partners, and other dependents without legal recourse when they are left out of a will. By tying inheritance to formal status, the law disadvantages non-traditional families and those who perform unpaid caregiving in an aging society.
Beyond the United States, other common-law jurisdictions have taken a different path. In Australia, England and Wales, Canada, and New Zealand, succession laws grant courts the power to adjust estates when dependents are left without adequate support. In these countries, eligibility extends beyond spouses and minor children to include former spouses, de facto partners, household members, and others in relationships of interdependence with the decedent. Judges weigh need, relationship, and moral duties through mediation and structured discretion. These systems show that protecting vulnerable survivors need not destabilize estate planning.
This Article proposes a framework of succession without status, a recalibration of testamentary freedom that recognizes claims grounded in caregiving and dependency. Drawing on comparative law and vulnerability theory, it develops three statutory models, ranging from a narrow “safety value” for dependent caregivers to broad inclusion for relationships of reliance. In an era of widening wealth gaps, longer lifespans, and increasing prevalence of informal care, inheritance law has become an overlooked vector of inequality. Succession law is an unexpected factor in determining who can age with stability and who remains unprotected. Recalibrating testamentary freedom to account for relational obligations is not an erosion of autonomy but a modest correction that aligns law with lived family structures.