Two Court Rulings Highlight Divorce Planning Loopholes
Careful drafting and continual monitoring of estate documents are critical to avoiding future pitfalls, especially in cases involving divorce. Two recent court cases serve as a paradigm for this need. In the first case, the Connecticut Supreme Court held that decanting was authorized in a divorce action. This effectively allowed the husband, who was the beneficiary of a 1983 trust established by his father, to transfer the trust assets into a new trust that prevented his wife from reaching them. In a New York case, the decedent named her ex-husband as executor and beneficiary of her estate. The alternate for both positions was the ex-husband’s father. Under New York law, an ex-spouse may not serve as an executor or beneficiary. The New York court held that this disqualification did not apply to the ex-husband’s father.
See Michael S. Fischer, Two Court Rulings Highlight Divorce Planning Loopholes, Financial Advisor, November 27, 2017.